Sri Lanka vs Viet Nam: Broad money to total reserves ratio
Broad money to total reserves ratio over time
- Sri Lanka
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 6.92 against 6.51 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.41.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 28th and Viet Nam ranks 29th of 159 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.88 | 3.1 | 0.2142 | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 4.07 | 4.41 | 0.3319 | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 5.44 | 7.93 | 2.49 | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher broad money to total reserves ratio, Sri Lanka or Viet Nam?
- Sri Lanka, at 6.92 against 6.51 in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in broad money to total reserves ratio between Sri Lanka and Viet Nam?
- 0.41, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Viet Nam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Viet Nam rank globally for broad money to total reserves ratio?
- Sri Lanka ranks 28th and Viet Nam ranks 29th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Broad money to total reserves ratio. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. Reserve assets are external assets, including monetary gold, that are readily available to and controlled by monetary authorities for meeting balance of payments financing needs, for intervention in exchange markets to affect the currency exchange rate, and for other related purposes (such as maintaining confidence in the currency and the economy, and serving as a basis for foreign borrowing). Reserve assets must be denominated and settled in foreign currency. This indicator is expressed as a ratio (a÷b).