Germany vs Japan: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Germany
- Japan
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0.2628 against 0.2598 in Japan, a difference of 0.003.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 25th and Japan ranks 26th of 39 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.3887 | 0.2516 | 0.1371 | Germany |
| 2030s | 0.3611 | 0.254 | 0.107 | Germany |
| 2040s | 0.2891 | 0.2494 | 0.0397 | Germany |
| 2050s | 0.2628 | 0.2598 | 0.003 | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Germany or Japan?
- Germany, at 0.2628 against 0.2598 in Japan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Germany and Japan?
- 0.003, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Japan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Germany and Japan rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Germany ranks 25th and Japan ranks 26th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.