Malaysia vs South Africa: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- Malaysia
- South Africa
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 128.4 against 120.62 in South Africa, a difference of 7.78.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was South Africa ahead.
Malaysia ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 17th of 47 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 126.67 | 120.62 | 6.05 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), Malaysia or South Africa?
- Malaysia, at 128.4 against 120.62 in South Africa as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Malaysia and South Africa?
- 7.78, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and South Africa rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- Malaysia ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 17th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).