Communication Cycle (C) in South Africa

South Africa: Communication Cycle (C) was 120.62 in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
120.62
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
17th
of 47 countries
All-time high
120.62
in 2010
All-time low
100
in 2007
Years of data
12
2007–2018

Communication Cycle (C) in South Africa, 2007–2018

02550751001252007201220182007: 1002008: 1002009: 1002010: 120.62011: 120.62012: 120.62013: 120.62014: 120.62015: 120.62016: 120.62017: 120.62018: 120.6

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2018, communication cycle (c) in South Africa stood at 120.62. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 20.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, communication cycle (c) in South Africa peaked at 120.62 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 100, in 2007.

South Africa ranks 17th of 47 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Communication Cycle (C) in South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Communication Cycle (C) (Index) in South Africa, 2007 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2007 100
2008 100 +0.0%
2009 100 +0.0%
2010 120.62 +20.6%
2011 120.62 +0.0%
2012 120.62 +0.0%
2013 120.62 +0.0%
2014 120.62 +0.0%
2015 120.62 +0.0%
2016 120.62 +0.0%
2017 120.62 +0.0%
2018 120.62 +0.0%

South Africa compared with similar countries

  • South Africa's 120.62 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 100, 1.2× the median. (20 countries reporting)
  • South Africa's 120.62 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 124.51, 97% of the median. (10 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 100 100 100 3
2010s 120.62 120.62 120.62 9

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 14 Kazakhstan 128.4 compare
  2. 14 Mauritius 128.4 compare
  3. 14 Malaysia 128.4 compare
  4. 17 Pakistan 120.62 compare
  5. 17 United States 120.62 compare
  6. 20 New Zealand 113.31 compare
  7. 20 Poland 113.31 compare
  8. 20 Rwanda 113.31 compare

See the full ranking of 48 places →

More financial sector data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is communication cycle (c) in South Africa?
Communication cycle (c) in South Africa was 120.62 in 2018, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest communication cycle (c) recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 120.62 in 2010.
What is the lowest communication cycle (c) recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 100 in 2007.
How does South Africa rank for communication cycle (c)?
South Africa ranks 17th out of 47 countries with data for 2018.
Is communication cycle (c) rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Communication Cycle (C) in South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/communication-cycle-c-index/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/communication-cycle-c-index/south-africa/">Communication Cycle (C) in South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communication Cycle (C) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 546 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).