South Africa vs United States: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- South Africa
- United States
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 120.62 against 120.62 in United States, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was United States ahead.
South Africa ranks 17th and United States ranks 17th of 47 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 120.62 | 111.17 | 9.45 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), South Africa or United States?
- South Africa, at 120.62 against 120.62 in United States as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between South Africa and United States?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United States?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do South Africa and United States rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- South Africa ranks 17th and United States ranks 17th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).