New Zealand vs South Africa: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- New Zealand
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 120.62 against 113.31 in New Zealand, a difference of 7.31.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 17th of 47 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 94.01 | 120.62 | 26.61 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), New Zealand or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 120.62 against 113.31 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between New Zealand and South Africa?
- 7.31, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and South Africa rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- New Zealand ranks 20th and South Africa ranks 17th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).