Sweden vs Uganda: Communication Cycle (C)
Communication Cycle (C) over time
- Sweden
- Uganda
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 100 against 100 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 25th of 47 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 84.1 | 103.09 | 18.99 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communication cycle (c), Sweden or Uganda?
- Sweden, at 100 against 100 in Uganda as of 2018.
- What is the difference in communication cycle (c) between Sweden and Uganda?
- 0, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Sweden and Uganda rank globally for communication cycle (c)?
- Sweden ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 25th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).