Communication Cycle (C) in Sweden

Sweden: Communication Cycle (C) was 100 in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
100
Change on year
up 45.5%
World rank
25th
of 47 countries
All-time high
100
in 2007
All-time low
68.73
in 2016
Years of data
12
2007–2018

Communication Cycle (C) in Sweden, 2007–2018

0204060801002007201220182007: 1002008: 1002009: 1002010: 73.22011: 73.22012: 73.22013: 1002014: 1002015: 1002016: 68.72017: 68.72018: 100

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

In 2018, communication cycle (c) in Sweden stood at 100. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 45.5% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, communication cycle (c) in Sweden peaked at 100 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 68.73, in 2016.

Sweden ranks 25th of 47 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.

Communication Cycle (C) in Sweden, year by year

Annual values for Communication Cycle (C) (Index) in Sweden, 2007 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2007 100
2008 100 +0.0%
2009 100 +0.0%
2010 73.16 -26.8%
2011 73.16 +0.0%
2012 73.16 +0.0%
2013 100 +36.7%
2014 100 +0.0%
2015 100 +0.0%
2016 68.73 -31.3%
2017 68.73 +0.0%
2018 100 +45.5%

Sweden compared with similar countries

  • Sweden's 100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 100, 1.0× the median. (17 countries reporting)
  • Sweden's 100 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 100, 1.0× the median. (15 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 100 100 100 3
2010s 84.1 68.73 100 9

Countries ranked near Sweden

  1. 23 Chile 106.45 compare
  2. 23 Uruguay 106.45 compare
  3. 25 Australia 100 compare
  4. 25 Brazil 100 compare
  5. 25 Canada 100 compare
  6. 25 China 100 compare
  7. 25 Colombia 100 compare
  8. 25 Czechia 100 compare
  9. 25 United Kingdom 100 compare
  10. 25 Iceland 100 compare
  11. 25 Nigeria 100 compare
  12. 25 Norway 100 compare
  13. 25 Peru 100 compare
  14. 25 Philippines 100 compare
  15. 25 Serbia 100 compare
  16. 25 Thailand 100 compare
  17. 25 Uganda 100 compare

See the full ranking of 48 places →

More financial sector data for Sweden

All data for Sweden →

Frequently asked questions

What is communication cycle (c) in Sweden?
Communication cycle (c) in Sweden was 100 in 2018, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest communication cycle (c) recorded in Sweden?
The highest recorded value was 100 in 2007.
What is the lowest communication cycle (c) recorded in Sweden?
The lowest recorded value was 68.73 in 2016.
How does Sweden rank for communication cycle (c)?
Sweden ranks 25th out of 47 countries with data for 2018.
Is communication cycle (c) rising or falling in Sweden?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Sweden data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Communication Cycle (C) (Index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Communication Cycle (C) in Sweden. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/communication-cycle-c-index/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/communication-cycle-c-index/sweden/">Communication Cycle (C) in Sweden</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communication Cycle (C) (Index)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
48 places, 546 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).