Aruba vs United Arab Emirates: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP

Aruba
63.8%
in 2020
United Arab Emirates
57.5%
in 2020
Aruba rank
37th
United Arab Emirates rank
40th

Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP over time

  • Aruba
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080198320012020

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 63.8% against 57.5% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 6.3%.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 37th and United Arab Emirates ranks 40th of 182 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 21.9% 12.5% 9.4% Aruba
2000s 44.8% 27.2% 17.6% Aruba
2010s 46.9% 42.2% 4.7% Aruba
2020s 63.8% 57.5% 6.4% Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp, Aruba or United Arab Emirates?
Aruba, at 63.8% against 57.5% in United Arab Emirates as of 2020.
What is the difference in consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp between Aruba and United Arab Emirates?
6.3%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and United Arab Emirates?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Aruba and United Arab Emirates rank globally for consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp?
Aruba ranks 37th and United Arab Emirates ranks 40th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), published as Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs United Arab Emirates: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/aruba/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/aruba/united-arab-emirates/">Aruba vs United Arab Emirates: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%)
Unit
%
Source
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 6,146 data points, 1983–2020
Last refreshed

The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.