Georgia vs Jordan: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP

Georgia
12.7%
in 2020
Jordan
13.0%
in 2020
Georgia rank
108th
Jordan rank
106th

Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP over time

  • Georgia
  • Jordan
020406080198320012020

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 13.0% against 12.7% in Georgia, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jordan ahead.

Georgia ranks 108th and Jordan ranks 106th of 182 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 13.8% 17.5% 3.6% Jordan
2000s 5.1% 15.4% 10.3% Jordan
2010s 8.5% 13.0% 4.5% Jordan
2020s 12.7% 13.0% 0.3% Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp, Georgia or Jordan?
Jordan, at 13.0% against 12.7% in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp between Georgia and Jordan?
0.3%, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Jordan rank globally for consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp?
Georgia ranks 108th and Jordan ranks 106th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), published as Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Jordan: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/georgia/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/georgia/jordan/">Georgia vs Jordan: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%)
Unit
%
Source
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 6,146 data points, 1983–2020
Last refreshed

The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.