Grenada vs Papua New Guinea: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP
Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP over time
- Grenada
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 17.2% against 16.6% in Grenada, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Grenada ranks 95th and Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd of 182 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 9.9% | 25.6% | 15.7% | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 13.5% | 8.8% | 4.6% | Grenada |
| 2000s | 30.9% | 4.6% | 26.4% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 31.2% | 23.1% | 8.2% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 16.6% | 17.2% | 0.6% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp, Grenada or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 17.2% against 16.6% in Grenada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp between Grenada and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.6%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Papua New Guinea?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2020.
- How do Grenada and Papua New Guinea rank globally for consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp?
- Grenada ranks 95th and Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), published as Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.