India vs Uzbekistan: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP
Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP over time
- India
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
India currently reports 10.2% against 9.9% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was India ahead.
India ranks 120th and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 182 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.8% | 4.6% | 2.2% | India |
| 2000s | 10.9% | 9.4% | 1.6% | India |
| 2010s | 12.3% | 3.5% | 8.8% | India |
| 2020s | 10.2% | 9.9% | 0.3% | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp, India or Uzbekistan?
- India, at 10.2% against 9.9% in Uzbekistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp between India and Uzbekistan?
- 0.3%, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Uzbekistan?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2020.
- How do India and Uzbekistan rank globally for consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp?
- India ranks 120th and Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), published as Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.