Jordan vs Suriname: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP

Jordan
13.0%
in 2020
Suriname
12.9%
in 2020
Jordan rank
106th
Suriname rank
107th

Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP over time

  • Jordan
  • Suriname
050100150198320012020

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 13.0% against 12.9% in Suriname, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 106th and Suriname ranks 107th of 182 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Suriname Difference Ahead
1980s 26.4% 3.9% 22.5% Jordan
1990s 25.5% 28.1% 2.6% Suriname
2000s 15.4% 5.4% 10.0% Jordan
2010s 13.0% 13.5% 0.5% Suriname
2020s 13.0% 12.9% 0.1% Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp, Jordan or Suriname?
Jordan, at 13.0% against 12.9% in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp between Jordan and Suriname?
0.1%, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Suriname?
38 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2020.
How do Jordan and Suriname rank globally for consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp?
Jordan ranks 106th and Suriname ranks 107th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), published as Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Suriname: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/jordan/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/jordan/suriname/">Jordan vs Suriname: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%)
Unit
%
Source
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 6,146 data points, 1983–2020
Last refreshed

The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.