Macau, China vs Panama: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP

Macau, China
180.0%
in 2020
Panama
151.1%
in 2020
Macau, China rank
9th
Panama rank
12th

Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP over time

  • Macau, China
  • Panama
0100200300400198320012020

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 180.0% against 151.1% in Panama, a difference of 28.9%.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Panama ahead.

Macau, China ranks 9th and Panama ranks 12th of 182 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Panama Difference Ahead
1980s 39.7% 354.8% 315.1% Panama
1990s 23.8% 301.3% 277.4% Panama
2000s 35.6% 263.9% 228.4% Panama
2010s 71.0% 188.2% 117.3% Panama
2020s 180.0% 151.1% 28.9% Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp, Macau, China or Panama?
Macau, China, at 180.0% against 151.1% in Panama as of 2020.
What is the difference in consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp between Macau, China and Panama?
28.9%, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Panama?
38 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2020.
How do Macau, China and Panama rank globally for consolidated foreign claims of bis reporting banks to gdp?
Macau, China ranks 9th and Panama ranks 12th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), published as Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Panama: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/macao-sar-china/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/consolidated-foreign-claims-of-bis-reporting-banks-to-gdp-percent/macao-sar-china/panama/">Macau, China vs Panama: Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%)
Unit
%
Source
Consolidated banking statistics, Bank for International Settlements (BIS)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
182 places, 6,146 data points, 1983–2020
Last refreshed

The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.