Georgia vs Myanmar: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Georgia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.6266 against 0.6175 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0091.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Myanmar ahead.
Georgia ranks 66th and Myanmar ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.6853 | 0.6853 | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 0.2435 | 0.7064 | 0.4629 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 0.3392 | 0.6843 | 0.3451 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0.498 | 0.6529 | 0.1549 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.6175 | 0.6266 | 0.0091 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Georgia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 0.6266 against 0.6175 in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Georgia and Myanmar?
- 0.0091, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Myanmar?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Myanmar rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Georgia ranks 66th and Myanmar ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.