Financial Institutions Efficiency Index in Georgia

Georgia: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index was 0.6175 in 2020. β—† Volatile

Latest (2020)
0.6175
Change on year
down 7.5%
World rank
66th
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.6697
in 2017
All-time low
0
in 1980
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Institutions Efficiency Index in Georgia, 1980–2020

00.20.40.61980200020201980: 01981: 01982: 01983: 01984: 01985: 01986: 01987: 01988: 01989: 01990: 01991: 01992: 01993: 01994: 0.3721995: 0.3721996: 0.4551997: 0.461998: 0.4071999: 0.3692000: 0.3462001: 0.5342002: 0.3652003: 0.3232004: 0.3132005: 0.262006: 0.2862007: 0.2542008: 0.492009: 0.222010: 0.3032011: 0.4042012: 0.3732013: 0.412014: 0.3782015: 0.4622016: 0.6532017: 0.672018: 0.6612019: 0.6672020: 0.617

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for financial institutions efficiency index in Georgia is 0.6175, measured in 2020.

That represents a change of down 7.5% on the previous year and up 103.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial institutions efficiency index in Georgia peaked at 0.6697 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1980.

Georgia ranks 66th of 183 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0 0 0 10
1990s 0.2435 0 0.4601 10
2000s 0.3392 0.2197 0.534 10
2010s 0.498 0.3033 0.6697 10
2020s 0.6175 0.6175 0.6175 1

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 63 Myanmar 0.6266 compare
  2. 64 Mexico 0.6242 compare
  3. 65 Namibia 0.6219 compare
  4. 67 Croatia, Republic of 0.6166 compare
  5. 68 Yemen, Republic of 0.6159 compare
  6. 69 Switzerland 0.6153 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Georgia

All data for Georgia β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial institutions efficiency index in Georgia?
Financial institutions efficiency index in Georgia was 0.6175 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial institutions efficiency index recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 0.6697 in 2017.
What is the lowest financial institutions efficiency index recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1980.
How does Georgia rank for financial institutions efficiency index?
Georgia ranks 66th out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial institutions efficiency index rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is up 103.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Institutions Efficiency Index in Georgia. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-institutions-efficiency-index/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-institutions-efficiency-index/georgia/">Financial Institutions Efficiency Index in Georgia</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.