Georgia vs Switzerland: Financial Institutions Efficiency Index
Financial Institutions Efficiency Index over time
- Georgia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.6175 against 0.6153 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.0022.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Switzerland ahead.
Georgia ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 69th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0.6322 | 0.6322 | Switzerland |
| 1990s | 0.2435 | 0.6197 | 0.3762 | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0.3392 | 0.6309 | 0.2916 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0.498 | 0.5982 | 0.1002 | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0.6175 | 0.6153 | 0.0022 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial institutions efficiency index, Georgia or Switzerland?
- Georgia, at 0.6175 against 0.6153 in Switzerland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial institutions efficiency index between Georgia and Switzerland?
- 0.0022, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Switzerland?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Switzerland rank globally for financial institutions efficiency index?
- Georgia ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 69th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Institutions Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.