Costa Rica vs Uruguay: Financial Markets Depth Index
Financial Markets Depth Index over time
- Costa Rica
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0621 against 0.0571 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.005.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 104th and Uruguay ranks 101st of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0154 | 0.0117 | 0.0038 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0214 | 0.0129 | 0.0085 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0465 | 0.0371 | 0.0094 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0596 | 0.0496 | 0.01 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.0571 | 0.0621 | 0.0051 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets depth index, Costa Rica or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0621 against 0.0571 in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets depth index between Costa Rica and Uruguay?
- 0.005, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uruguay?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Uruguay rank globally for financial markets depth index?
- Costa Rica ranks 104th and Uruguay ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.