Financial Markets Depth Index in Uruguay

Uruguay: Financial Markets Depth Index was 0.0621 in 2020. β—† Volatile

Latest (2020)
0.0621
Change on year
up 2.1%
World rank
101st
of 183 countries
All-time high
0.0621
in 2020
All-time low
0.0076
in 1992
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Markets Depth Index in Uruguay, 1980–2020

00.020.040.061980200020201980: 0.011981: 0.0111982: 0.0191983: 0.0131984: 0.0111985: 0.0121986: 0.0111987: 0.0091988: 0.011989: 0.011990: 0.0091991: 0.0081992: 0.0081993: 0.0131994: 0.0221995: 0.0221996: 0.0091997: 0.0111998: 0.0131999: 0.0152000: 0.0372001: 0.032002: 0.042003: 0.0412004: 0.0372005: 0.0352006: 0.0362007: 0.0422008: 0.0362009: 0.0362010: 0.0342011: 0.0462012: 0.0472013: 0.0472014: 0.0472015: 0.0542016: 0.0582017: 0.0512018: 0.052019: 0.0612020: 0.062

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for financial markets depth index in Uruguay is 0.0621, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 41 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.1% on the previous year and up 82.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial markets depth index in Uruguay peaked at 0.0621 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0076, in 1992.

Uruguay ranks 101st of 183 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.0117 0.0089 0.0191 10
1990s 0.0129 0.0076 0.0223 10
2000s 0.0371 0.0299 0.0424 10
2010s 0.0496 0.034 0.0608 10
2020s 0.0621 0.0621 0.0621 1

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 98 Nigeria 0.0686 compare
  2. 99 Zambia 0.065 compare
  3. 100 Romania 0.064 compare
  4. 102 St. Lucia 0.0617 compare
  5. 103 Slovak Republic 0.0594 compare
  6. 104 Costa Rica 0.0571 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial markets depth index in Uruguay?
Financial markets depth index in Uruguay was 0.0621 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial markets depth index recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 0.0621 in 2020.
What is the lowest financial markets depth index recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0076 in 1992.
How does Uruguay rank for financial markets depth index?
Uruguay ranks 101st out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial markets depth index rising or falling in Uruguay?
Over the last ten years it is up 82.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Markets Depth Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Markets Depth Index in Uruguay. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-depth-index/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-depth-index/uruguay/">Financial Markets Depth Index in Uruguay</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Markets Depth Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.