New Zealand vs Singapore: Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Financial Markets Efficiency Index over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.2073 against 0.2022 in Singapore, a difference of 0.0051.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 41 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.
New Zealand ranks 43rd and Singapore ranks 45th of 183 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1127 | 0.3078 | 0.1952 | Singapore |
| 1990s | 0.3518 | 0.6652 | 0.3134 | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0.2438 | 0.7387 | 0.495 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 0.1379 | 0.4079 | 0.2699 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0.2073 | 0.2022 | 0.0051 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial markets efficiency index, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 0.2073 against 0.2022 in Singapore as of 2020.
- What is the difference in financial markets efficiency index between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 0.0051, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for financial markets efficiency index?
- New Zealand ranks 43rd and Singapore ranks 45th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.