Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Singapore

Singapore: Financial Markets Efficiency Index was 0.2022 in 2020. β–² Rising

Latest (2020)
0.2022
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
45th
of 183 countries
All-time high
1
in 2008
All-time low
0.1612
in 1985
Years of data
41
1980–2020

Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Singapore, 1980–2020

0.20.40.60.811980200020201980: 0.1841981: 0.2261982: 0.2551983: 0.4441984: 0.3871985: 0.1611986: 0.1991987: 0.4991988: 0.2381989: 0.4851990: 0.7591991: 0.4691992: 0.4771993: 0.7771994: 0.8181995: 0.5331996: 0.4961997: 0.8761998: 0.761999: 0.6872000: 0.7692001: 0.7592002: 0.7672003: 0.7842004: 0.6292005: 0.5592006: 0.5972007: 0.8732008: 12009: 0.6512010: 0.5832011: 0.5672012: 0.4212013: 0.4622014: 0.3292015: 0.3822016: 0.3942017: 0.3442018: 0.3942019: 0.2022020: 0.202

Source: International Monetary Fund.

Analysis

The most recent figure for financial markets efficiency index in Singapore is 0.2022, measured in 2020.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 65.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, financial markets efficiency index in Singapore peaked at 1 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.1612, in 1985.

Singapore ranks 45th of 183 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 41 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1980s 0.3078 0.1612 0.4987 10
1990s 0.6652 0.469 0.8762 10
2000s 0.7387 0.5594 1 10
2010s 0.4079 0.2022 0.5832 10
2020s 0.2022 0.2022 0.2022 1

Countries ranked near Singapore

  1. 42 Saudi Arabia 0.2467 compare
  2. 43 New Zealand 0.2073 compare
  3. 44 Bangladesh 0.2051 compare
  4. 46 Qatar 0.173 compare
  5. 47 United Arab Emirates 0.157 compare
  6. 48 Kuwait 0.1534 compare

See the full ranking of 192 places β†’

More financial sector data for Singapore

All data for Singapore β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is financial markets efficiency index in Singapore?
Financial markets efficiency index in Singapore was 0.2022 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
What is the highest financial markets efficiency index recorded in Singapore?
The highest recorded value was 1 in 2008.
What is the lowest financial markets efficiency index recorded in Singapore?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1612 in 1985.
How does Singapore rank for financial markets efficiency index?
Singapore ranks 45th out of 183 countries with data for 2020.
Is financial markets efficiency index rising or falling in Singapore?
Over the last ten years it is down 65.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Singapore data come from?
The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Financial Markets Efficiency Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 41 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Singapore. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-efficiency-index/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/stat/financial-markets-efficiency-index/singapore/">Financial Markets Efficiency Index in Singapore</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial Markets Efficiency Index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
192 places, 7,872 data points, 1980–2020
Last refreshed

The dataset contains nine indices that summarize how developed financial institutions and financial markets are in terms of their depth, access, and efficiency. These indices are aggregated into an overall index of financial development. With the coverage of over 180 countries on annual frequency from 1980 onwards, the database should offer a useful analytical tool for researchers and policy makers.