Iceland vs Malaysia: Independence and Accountability (IA)
Independence and Accountability (IA) over time
- Iceland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 148.61 against 117.65 in Iceland, a difference of 30.96.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 8th and Malaysia ranks 6th of 47 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 112.91 | 138.24 | 25.34 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher independence and accountability (ia), Iceland or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 148.61 against 117.65 in Iceland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in independence and accountability (ia) between Iceland and Malaysia?
- 30.96, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malaysia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Malaysia rank globally for independence and accountability (ia)?
- Iceland ranks 8th and Malaysia ranks 6th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).