Malaysia vs Rwanda: Independence and Accountability (IA)
Independence and Accountability (IA) over time
- Malaysia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 148.61 against 143.57 in Rwanda, a difference of 5.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Rwanda ahead.
Malaysia ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 47 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 138.24 | 126.35 | 11.89 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher independence and accountability (ia), Malaysia or Rwanda?
- Malaysia, at 148.61 against 143.57 in Rwanda as of 2018.
- What is the difference in independence and accountability (ia) between Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 5.04, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Rwanda rank globally for independence and accountability (ia)?
- Malaysia ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Independence and Accountability (IA) (Index). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Monetary policy framework comprises the structures in place that enable and guide the conduct of monetary policy. In this project, we provide a multidimensional characterization of monetary policy frameworks across three pillars: Independence and Accountability, Policy and Operational Strategy, and Communications (IAPOC). This database covers 50 advanced economies, emerging markets, and low-income developing countries, from 2007 to 2018 (being extended).