Belarus vs Ecuador: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Belarus
114.11
in 2025
Ecuador
2,883
in 2025
Belarus rank
74th
Ecuador rank
73rd

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
010.0M20.0M30.0M200420142025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,883 against 114.11 in Belarus, a difference of 2,769.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 25.3 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 74th and Ecuador ranks 73rd of 82 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 7.00 million 956,106 6.05 million Belarus
2020s 2.28 million 435,772 1.84 million Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Belarus or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 2,883 against 114.11 in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Belarus and Ecuador?
2,769, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Belarus ranks 74th and Ecuador ranks 73rd of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ecuador: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/belarus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/belarus/ecuador/">Belarus vs Ecuador: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.