Bolivia vs Georgia: Memorandum items: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL) … not

Bolivia
2,944
in 2020
Georgia
28,708
in 2025
Bolivia rank
72nd
Georgia rank
70th

Memorandum items: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL) … not over time

  • Bolivia
  • Georgia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B200720162025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 28,708 against 2,944 in Bolivia, a difference of 25,764.

That makes Georgia's figure about 9.8 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 70th of 82 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 1.08 billion 293.55 million 782.29 million Bolivia
2020s 2,944 328.52 million 328.52 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Bolivia or Georgia?
Georgia, at 28,708 against 2,944 in Bolivia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Bolivia and Georgia?
25,764, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Georgia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Bolivia and Georgia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Bolivia ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 70th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Georgia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/bolivia/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/bolivia/georgia/">Bolivia vs Georgia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.