Brazil vs France: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Brazil
10.74 billion
in 2025
France
8.66 billion
in 2025
Brazil rank
15th
France rank
17th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Brazil
  • France
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B200020122025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 10.74 billion against 8.66 billion in France, a difference of 2.07 billion.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times France's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 15th and France ranks 17th of 82 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and France in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil France Difference Ahead
2010s 19.36 billion 7.25 billion 12.12 billion Brazil
2020s 6.01 billion 7.99 billion 1.98 billion France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Brazil or France?
Brazil, at 10.74 billion against 8.66 billion in France as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Brazil and France?
2.07 billion, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and France?
12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
How do Brazil and France rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Brazil ranks 15th and France ranks 17th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs France: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/brazil/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/brazil/france/">Brazil vs France: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.