China vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

China
435.42 billion
in 2024
Singapore
67.15 billion
in 2025
China rank
1st
Singapore rank
3rd

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • China
  • Singapore
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B200020122025

How they compare

China currently reports 435.42 billion against 67.15 billion in Singapore, a difference of 368.27 billion.

That makes China's figure about 6.5 times Singapore's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 82 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Singapore Difference Ahead
2010s 275.24 billion 51.20 billion 224.04 billion China
2020s 359.11 billion 61.80 billion 297.31 billion China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, China or Singapore?
China, at 435.42 billion against 67.15 billion in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between China and Singapore?
368.27 billion, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Singapore?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do China and Singapore rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/china/singapore/">China vs Singapore: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.