Croatia vs Cyprus: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Croatia
416,740
in 2025
Cyprus
151,228
in 2025
Croatia rank
68th
Cyprus rank
69th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M200020122025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 416,740 against 151,228 in Cyprus, a difference of 265,512.

That makes Croatia's figure about 2.8 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cyprus ahead.

Croatia ranks 68th and Cyprus ranks 69th of 82 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Cyprus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Cyprus Difference Ahead
2010s 309,453 530,874 221,421 Cyprus
2020s 3.84 million 208,911 3.63 million Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Croatia or Cyprus?
Croatia, at 416,740 against 151,228 in Cyprus as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Croatia and Cyprus?
265,512, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Cyprus?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Cyprus rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Croatia ranks 68th and Cyprus ranks 69th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Cyprus: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/croatia/cyprus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/croatia/cyprus/">Croatia vs Cyprus: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.