Cyprus vs Georgia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Cyprus
151,228
in 2025
Georgia
28,708
in 2025
Cyprus rank
69th
Georgia rank
70th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Cyprus
  • Georgia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M200720162025

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 151,228 against 28,708 in Georgia, a difference of 122,520.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 5.3 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Georgia ahead.

Cyprus ranks 69th and Georgia ranks 70th of 82 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 530,874 238.25 million 237.72 million Georgia
2020s 208,911 141.83 million 141.62 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Cyprus or Georgia?
Cyprus, at 151,228 against 28,708 in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Cyprus and Georgia?
122,520, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Georgia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and Georgia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Cyprus ranks 69th and Georgia ranks 70th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Georgia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/cyprus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/cyprus/georgia/">Cyprus vs Georgia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.