Czechia vs Israel: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Czechia
26.81 billion
in 2025
Israel
15.73 billion
in 2025
Czechia rank
9th
Israel rank
12th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Czechia
  • Israel
010.0B20.0B30.0B200620152025

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 26.81 billion against 15.73 billion in Israel, a difference of 11.07 billion.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.7 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Israel ahead.

Czechia ranks 9th and Israel ranks 12th of 82 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Israel Difference Ahead
2010s 13.92 billion 2.95 billion 10.97 billion Czechia
2020s 22.46 billion 10.50 billion 11.95 billion Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Czechia or Israel?
Czechia, at 26.81 billion against 15.73 billion in Israel as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Czechia and Israel?
11.07 billion, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Israel?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Czechia and Israel rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Czechia ranks 9th and Israel ranks 12th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Israel: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/czechia/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/czechia/israel/">Czechia vs Israel: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.