Egypt vs Lithuania: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Egypt
1.42 billion
in 2025
Lithuania
1.38 billion
in 2025
Egypt rank
36th
Lithuania rank
37th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Egypt
  • Lithuania
0500.0M1.0B1.5B200420142025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.42 billion against 1.38 billion in Lithuania, a difference of 40.09 million.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 82 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 68.30 million 100,000 68.20 million Egypt
2010s 52.60 million 578.06 million 525.46 million Lithuania
2020s 802.02 million 927.15 million 125.13 million Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Egypt or Lithuania?
Egypt, at 1.42 billion against 1.38 billion in Lithuania as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Egypt and Lithuania?
40.09 million, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Lithuania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Lithuania rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Egypt ranks 36th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Lithuania: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/egypt-arab-rep/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/egypt-arab-rep/lithuania/">Egypt vs Lithuania: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.