Germany vs Italy: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Germany
3.51 billion
in 2025
Italy
4.87 billion
in 2025
Germany rank
25th
Italy rank
23rd

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Germany
  • Italy
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199920122025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 4.87 billion against 3.51 billion in Germany, a difference of 1.37 billion.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.4 times Germany's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 25th and Italy ranks 23rd of 82 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 6.90 million 3.76 billion 3.76 billion Italy
2010s 1.03 billion 4.29 billion 3.27 billion Italy
2020s 3.20 billion 4.50 billion 1.30 billion Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Germany or Italy?
Italy, at 4.87 billion against 3.51 billion in Germany as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Germany and Italy?
1.37 billion, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Italy?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Germany and Italy rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Germany ranks 25th and Italy ranks 23rd of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Italy: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/germany/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/germany/italy/">Germany vs Italy: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.