Germany vs Sweden: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Germany
3.51 billion
in 2025
Sweden
3.44 billion
in 2025
Germany rank
25th
Sweden rank
27th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Germany
  • Sweden
02.0B4.0B6.0B199920122025

How they compare

Germany currently reports 3.51 billion against 3.44 billion in Sweden, a difference of 64.41 million.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 25th and Sweden ranks 27th of 82 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 6.31 million 446.17 million 439.86 million Sweden
2010s 1.03 billion 3.88 billion 2.86 billion Sweden
2020s 3.20 billion 4.70 billion 1.50 billion Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Germany or Sweden?
Germany, at 3.51 billion against 3.44 billion in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Germany and Sweden?
64.41 million, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Sweden?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Germany and Sweden rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Germany ranks 25th and Sweden ranks 27th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Sweden: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/germany/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/germany/sweden/">Germany vs Sweden: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.