Iceland vs Mongolia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Iceland
1.89 million
in 2025
Mongolia
2.03 million
in 2025
Iceland rank
63rd
Mongolia rank
62nd

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Iceland
  • Mongolia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B200020122025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 2.03 million against 1.89 million in Iceland, a difference of 138,230.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Mongolia ahead.

Iceland ranks 63rd and Mongolia ranks 62nd of 82 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 1.91 million 59.36 million 57.45 million Mongolia
2020s 2.76 million 1.26 million 1.50 million Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Iceland or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 2.03 million against 1.89 million in Iceland as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Iceland and Mongolia?
138,230, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mongolia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Mongolia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Iceland ranks 63rd and Mongolia ranks 62nd of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mongolia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/iceland/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/iceland/mongolia/">Iceland vs Mongolia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.