Korea vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Korea
33.94 billion
in 2025
Poland
36.21 billion
in 2025
Korea rank
7th
Poland rank
4th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Korea
  • Poland
020.0B40.0B60.0B200520152025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 36.21 billion against 33.94 billion in Korea, a difference of 2.27 billion.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Korea ahead.

Korea ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 82 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 9.50 billion 4.20 billion 5.30 billion Korea
2010s 29.78 billion 16.44 billion 13.34 billion Korea
2020s 30.79 billion 34.07 billion 3.28 billion Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Korea or Poland?
Poland, at 36.21 billion against 33.94 billion in Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Korea and Poland?
2.27 billion, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Poland?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Korea and Poland rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Korea ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/korea-rep/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/korea-rep/poland/">Korea vs Poland: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.