Latvia vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Latvia
640.38 million
in 2025
Netherlands
623.00 million
in 2025
Latvia rank
45th
Netherlands rank
46th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Latvia
  • Netherlands
0500.0M1.0B1.5B200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 640.38 million against 623.00 million in Netherlands, a difference of 17.38 million.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 45th and Netherlands ranks 46th of 82 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 100.98 million 800,000 100.18 million Latvia
2010s 560.47 million 370.40 million 190.07 million Latvia
2020s 508.78 million 360.00 million 148.78 million Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Latvia or Netherlands?
Latvia, at 640.38 million against 623.00 million in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Latvia and Netherlands?
17.38 million, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Latvia ranks 45th and Netherlands ranks 46th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/latvia/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/latvia/netherlands/">Latvia vs Netherlands: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.