Malta vs Serbia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Malta
730.92 million
in 2025
Serbia
897.90 million
in 2025
Malta rank
43rd
Serbia rank
40th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Malta
  • Serbia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M200920172025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 897.90 million against 730.92 million in Malta, a difference of 166.98 million.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Serbia ahead.

Malta ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 40th of 82 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 235.91 million 346.58 million 110.67 million Serbia
2020s 491.34 million 555.53 million 64.19 million Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Malta or Serbia?
Serbia, at 897.90 million against 730.92 million in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Malta and Serbia?
166.98 million, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Serbia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Malta and Serbia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Malta ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 40th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Serbia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/malta/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/malta/serbia/">Malta vs Serbia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.