Mexico vs Slovakia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in

Mexico
1.88 billion
in 2025
Slovakia
1.83 billion
in 2024
Mexico rank
33rd
Slovakia rank
34th

Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in over time

  • Mexico
  • Slovakia
05.0B10.0B15.0B199920122025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 1.88 billion against 1.83 billion in Slovakia, a difference of 46.53 million.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 33rd and Slovakia ranks 34th of 82 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Slovakia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.91 billion 6.91 million 1.90 billion Mexico
2010s 7.65 billion 8.27 million 7.64 billion Mexico
2020s 3.13 billion 482.46 million 2.65 billion Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in, Mexico or Slovakia?
Mexico, at 1.88 billion against 1.83 billion in Slovakia as of 2025.
What is the difference in memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in between Mexico and Slovakia?
46.53 million, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Slovakia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Mexico and Slovakia rank globally for memorandum items, currency composition of reserves, denominated in?
Mexico ranks 33rd and Slovakia ranks 34th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Slovakia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/mexico/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/memorandum-items-currency-composition-of-reserves-denominated-in-currencies-not-in-sdr/mexico/slovak-republic/">Mexico vs Slovakia: Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Memorandum items, Currency composition of reserves, Denominated in Currencies not in SDR basket (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Security)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,633 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.