Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using

Australia
-11.46 billion
in 2024
Chinese Taipei
-8.63 billion
in 2024
Australia rank
189th
Chinese Taipei rank
188th

Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using over time

  • Australia
  • Chinese Taipei
-10.0B-5.0B05.0B10.0B200520142024

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports -8.63 billion against -11.46 billion in Australia, a difference of 2.83 billion.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.

Australia ranks 189th and Chinese Taipei ranks 188th of 197 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2010s -524.69 million 3.30 billion 3.83 billion Chinese Taipei
2020s 1.26 billion -628.00 million 1.89 billion Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net errors and omissions, net (credits less debits), adjusted using, Australia or Chinese Taipei?
Chinese Taipei, at -8.63 billion against -11.46 billion in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in net errors and omissions, net (credits less debits), adjusted using between Australia and Chinese Taipei?
2.83 billion, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chinese Taipei?
15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Australia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for net errors and omissions, net (credits less debits), adjusted using?
Australia ranks 189th and Chinese Taipei ranks 188th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using IMF accounting records (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-errors-and-omissions-net-credits-less-debits-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-us/australia/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-errors-and-omissions-net-credits-less-debits-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-us/australia/taiwan/">Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using IMF accounting records (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
206 places, 3,854 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.