Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Sweden: Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
-622.52 million
in 2024
Sweden
51.87 billion
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank
5th
Sweden rank
2nd

Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
  • Sweden
-50.0B-25.0B025.0B50.0B200520142024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 51.87 billion against -622.52 million in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a difference of 52.49 billion.

That makes Sweden's figure about 83.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)'s.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sweden ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 2nd of 9 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s -19.04 billion -21.00 billion 1.96 billion Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
2010s -14.37 billion -5.88 billion 8.49 billion Sweden
2020s -6.74 billion -383.95 million 6.35 billion Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net errors and omissions, net (credits less debits), adjusted using, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 51.87 billion against -622.52 million in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as of 2024.
What is the difference in net errors and omissions, net (credits less debits), adjusted using between Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Sweden?
52.49 billion, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Sweden?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Sweden rank globally for net errors and omissions, net (credits less debits), adjusted using?
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 5th and Sweden ranks 2nd of 9 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using IMF accounting records (US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Sweden: Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-errors-and-omissions-net-credits-less-debits-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-us/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/net-errors-and-omissions-net-credits-less-debits-adjusted-using-imf-accounting-records-us/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/sweden/">Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Sweden: Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net errors and omissions, Net (credits less debits), Adjusted using IMF accounting records (US dollar)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
206 places, 3,854 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The World and Country Group Aggregates (historically called BOPSY) is an annual publication, released each November, of major balance of payments and international investment position components for countries, country groups, and the world.