Ecuador vs Slovakia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Ecuador
3.69 billion
in 2025
Slovakia
2.66 billion
in 2024
Ecuador rank
45th
Slovakia rank
48th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Ecuador
  • Slovakia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199920122025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.69 billion against 2.66 billion in Slovakia, a difference of 1.04 billion.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Slovakia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Slovakia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 45th and Slovakia ranks 48th of 87 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Slovakia Difference Ahead
2010s 665.11 million 1.43 billion 763.66 million Slovakia
2020s 1.93 billion 2.08 billion 151.24 million Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Ecuador or Slovakia?
Ecuador, at 3.69 billion against 2.66 billion in Slovakia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Ecuador and Slovakia?
1.04 billion, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovakia?
7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Slovakia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Ecuador ranks 45th and Slovakia ranks 48th of 87 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold (including gold deposits and if appropriate gold swapped) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Slovakia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-10/ecuador/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-10/ecuador/slovak-republic/">Ecuador vs Slovakia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold (including gold deposits and if appropriate gold swapped) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
89 places, 1,852 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.