Georgia vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Georgia
1.00 billion
in 2025
Latvia
922.38 million
in 2025
Georgia rank
57th
Latvia rank
59th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Georgia
  • Latvia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B200020122025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1.00 billion against 922.38 million in Latvia, a difference of 79.94 million.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Latvia ahead.

Georgia ranks 57th and Latvia ranks 59th of 87 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 304.52 million 304.52 million Latvia
2020s 800.52 million 740.13 million 60.39 million Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Georgia or Latvia?
Georgia, at 1.00 billion against 922.38 million in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Georgia and Latvia?
79.94 million, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Georgia ranks 57th and Latvia ranks 59th of 87 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold (including gold deposits and if appropriate gold swapped) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-10/georgia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-10/georgia/latvia/">Georgia vs Latvia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold (including gold deposits and if appropriate gold swapped) (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
89 places, 1,852 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.