Colombia vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Colombia
150,307
in 2025
Slovenia
135,850
in 2025
Colombia rank
62nd
Slovenia rank
63rd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Colombia
  • Slovenia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k200020122025

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 150,307 against 135,850 in Slovenia, a difference of 14,457.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 62nd and Slovenia ranks 63rd of 82 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 284,720 160,179 124,541 Colombia
2010s 304,141 102,331 201,810 Colombia
2020s 146,867 88,568 58,299 Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Colombia or Slovenia?
Colombia, at 150,307 against 135,850 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Colombia and Slovenia?
14,457, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Slovenia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Slovenia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Colombia ranks 62nd and Slovenia ranks 63rd of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/colombia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/colombia/slovenia/">Colombia vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,743 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.