Denmark vs Jordan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Denmark
2.14 million
in 2025
Jordan
2.34 million
in 2025
Denmark rank
37th
Jordan rank
35th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Denmark
  • Jordan
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M199920122025

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 2.34 million against 2.14 million in Denmark, a difference of 203,380.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 37th and Jordan ranks 35th of 82 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 2.14 million 417,500 1.72 million Denmark
2010s 2.14 million 931,000 1.20 million Denmark
2020s 2.14 million 2.20 million 59,883 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Denmark or Jordan?
Jordan, at 2.34 million against 2.14 million in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Denmark and Jordan?
203,380, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Jordan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Jordan rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Denmark ranks 37th and Jordan ranks 35th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Jordan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/denmark/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/denmark/jordan/">Denmark vs Jordan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,743 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.