Iceland vs Sri Lanka: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Iceland
63,786
in 2025
Sri Lanka
19,900
in 2025
Iceland rank
67th
Sri Lanka rank
70th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Iceland
  • Sri Lanka
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k200020122025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 63,786 against 19,900 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 43,886.

That makes Iceland's figure about 3.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Iceland ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 82 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 63,785 683,031 619,246 Sri Lanka
2020s 63,786 62,745 1,041 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Iceland or Sri Lanka?
Iceland, at 63,786 against 19,900 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Iceland and Sri Lanka?
43,886, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sri Lanka?
11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
How do Iceland and Sri Lanka rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Iceland ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sri Lanka: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/iceland/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/iceland/sri-lanka/">Iceland vs Sri Lanka: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,743 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.