Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Luxembourg
72,101
in 2025
Slovenia
135,850
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
65th
Slovenia rank
63rd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Slovenia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k200020122025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 135,850 against 72,101 in Luxembourg, a difference of 63,749.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.9 times Luxembourg's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Slovenia ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 65th and Slovenia ranks 63rd of 82 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 73,529 116,898 43,368 Slovenia
2010s 72,253 102,331 30,078 Slovenia
2020s 72,259 88,568 16,309 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Luxembourg or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 135,850 against 72,101 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Luxembourg and Slovenia?
63,749, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Slovenia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Slovenia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Luxembourg ranks 65th and Slovenia ranks 63rd of 82 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/luxembourg/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-12/luxembourg/slovenia/">Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets, gold volume in millions of fine troy ounces (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Govern
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
84 places, 1,743 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.