Belgium vs United Kingdom: Official Reserve Assets: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 … Mone

Belgium
0
in 2025
United Kingdom
0
in 2025
Belgium rank
17th
United Kingdom rank
17th

Official Reserve Assets: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 … Mone over time

  • Belgium
  • United Kingdom
01.0B2.0B3.0B200020122025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 against 0 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

Across all 26 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 17th of 62 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 398.98 million 1.52 billion 1.13 billion United Kingdom
2010s 11.19 million 337.40 million 326.21 million United Kingdom
2020s 0 3.17 million 3.17 million United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belgium or United Kingdom?
Belgium, at 0 against 0 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belgium and United Kingdom?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and United Kingdom?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Belgium and United Kingdom rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belgium ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 17th of 62 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions in the reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mone. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs United Kingdom: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-15/belgium/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-15/belgium/united-kingdom/">Belgium vs United Kingdom: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions in the reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mone
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
64 places, 1,212 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.