Italy vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Italy
860.60 million
in 2025
Japan
411.00 million
in 2025
Italy rank
5th
Japan rank
6th

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Italy
  • Japan
020.0B40.0B60.0B200020122025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 860.60 million against 411.00 million in Japan, a difference of 449.60 million.

That makes Italy's figure about 2.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.

Italy ranks 5th and Japan ranks 6th of 62 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 923.13 million 33.90 billion 32.97 billion Japan
2010s 260.70 million 4.52 billion 4.26 billion Japan
2020s 358.06 million 488.83 million 130.77 million Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Italy or Japan?
Italy, at 860.60 million against 411.00 million in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Italy and Japan?
449.60 million, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Japan?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Italy and Japan rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Italy ranks 5th and Japan ranks 6th of 62 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions in the reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mone. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-15/italy/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-15/italy/japan/">Italy vs Japan: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve currency and deposits, banks and other financial institutions in the reporting country (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Mone
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
64 places, 1,212 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.