Belarus vs Georgia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Belarus
27,400
in 2025
Georgia
29,839
in 2025
Belarus rank
84th
Georgia rank
83rd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
010.0k20.0k30.0k200420142025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 29,839 against 27,400 in Belarus, a difference of 2,439.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Georgia ahead.

Belarus ranks 84th and Georgia ranks 83rd of 91 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 0 15,627 15,627 Georgia
2010s 20,100 19,477 622.85 Belarus
2020s 27,386 29,726 2,340 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Belarus or Georgia?
Georgia, at 29,839 against 27,400 in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Belarus and Georgia?
2,439, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Belarus ranks 84th and Georgia ranks 83rd of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.