Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets

Bosnia and Herzegovina
497,498
in 2025
Namibia
191,318
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
79th
Namibia rank
82nd

Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Namibia
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k201920222025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 497,498 against 191,318 in Namibia, a difference of 306,180.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 2.6 times Namibia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 91 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 497,498 against 191,318 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
306,180, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for official reserve assets and other foreign currency assets?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th and Namibia ranks 82nd of 91 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/official-reserve-assets-and-other-foreign-currency-assets-approximate-market-value-2/bosnia-and-herzegovina/namibia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Official Reserve Assets and Other Foreign Currency Assets (approximate market value), Official reserve assets IMF reserve position (International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Guidelines for a Data Template 2013 (IRFCL 2013), Monetary Authorities and Central Government excluding Social Se
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
93 places, 1,878 data points, 1999–2025
Last refreshed

The International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (IRFCL, or the “Reserves Data Template”) dataset includes data on the amount and composition of countries’ official reserve assets, other foreign currency assets held by monetary authorities and central governments, and short-term foreign currency obligations and related activities of monetary authorities and central governments that can lead to drains on official reserves and other foreign currency assets. This website re-disseminates IMF member countries' data on international reserves and foreign currency liquidity in a common template and in a common currency (the U.S. dollar). Historical data by country are also available. Please note that the re-dissemination of the template data by the Fund does not constitute endorsement of the quality of the data by the Fund.